India doesn't have a jobs crisis, it has a wages crisis

Is technology killing jobs? And can India use technology to create jobs? Teamlease’s Manish Sabharwal says, our problem is providing a living wage, not jobs. We need to worry about improving productivity through the application of land, labour, and capital—and not so much the impact of automation

N S Ramnath

The approach to automation and jobs will differ for rich countries like the US and countries like India.

Automation matters for a country at a per capita income of $45,000, says Manish Sabharwal, the chairman of staffing firm Teamlease. There technology is deflationary for wages. The US unemployment is probably the lowest ever, yet wages are not moving up. So, the US and developed countries are trying to prevent people from falling into poverty. India is trying to pull people out of poverty. Those are two completely different problems.

“At our per capita of $1,500, our problem is the application of land, labour, capital, and how it combines—total-factor productivity. Poverty is about productivity. Why does Joe Sixpack make $50,000 a year and Ram Bharose make Rs 50,000 a year? … It is the institutions, the infrastructure—I am not sure it is Silicon Valley,” he says.

Technology is important, Sabharwal says, but not of the cutting edge artificial intelligence/machine learning kind. We can raise incomes to $8-10,000 if we

  • reduce regulatory cholesterol (“If you take the entire universe of compliance in India, there are 60,000 compliance items, 3,600 annual filings and it changes 5,000 times a year.”)
  • improve human capital , and
  • build infrastructure (“The average taxi in Bangalore travels at 8 kmph. Most people can walk that fast. So what happened to the productivity of the internal combustion engine?”)

Can the expansion of manufacturing lift wages?

“The peak of any country's labour force in manufacturing was Britain in World War II, which was 45%. America peaked at 33%, China at 28%, but India is at 11%. Now, I don't think we'll ever get to 45, 33 or 28 because manufacturing has changed. But I think 11% is the wrong number. Make in India might be Make for India. If you look at the $65 billion in foreign direct investment, it is concentrated in areas where domestic consumption is getting to a critical mass—automobiles, washing machines, etc. So, we can get from 11% to 18-20% of our labour force in manufacturing.”

Provided, of course, we reduce regulatory cholesterol, and improve infrastructure and human capital. And break the low-level equilibrium of informality in India.

“Our stereotype when we talk of an enterprise, is not Marico, Lupin or the Tatas. It is an informal micro, small and medium enterprise (MSME). And informal MSMEs can't be productive…. We don't need 63 million non-farm enterprises. … they keep our unemployment at 5% but they keep our poverty alive because they don’t have the productivity to pay the wage premium,” he says.

He adds, institutions, formality, urbanisation, human capital, financialisation are all technologies in the early stages of a country of our scale and size.

So, what can we reasonably expect in 2019?

“Formalisation, financialisation, urbanisation, human capital take a long time to play out. Whoever comes back is unlikely to be that ideological about things if they are improving, which I think they are.

“This racket you are hearing about jobs is that Indians are tired of self-exploitation. Small farms, where you don't have to pay yourself a salary, or rent, has been India's shock absorber for the economy and society since Independence. But Indians are now tired of that. They are saying, I don't want a minimum wage, I want a living wage. Why should I accept subsistence self-employment? Politicians have lost that shock absorber of self-exploitation by Indians.

“India has had a jobs emergency—which is a poverty emergency—since Independence. That has not changed, our patience with the same problem has come down. And I think that's fantastic. It's a rocket fuel for change. Societies only change when your aspirations far exceed the system's current ability to deliver it.”

Virtuoso

Virtuoso features conversations with a cross-section of veteran entrepreneurs, business strategists and thought leaders from India and abroad

Was this article useful? Sign up and we'll send you articles like this every week. Here's a sample

Comments

Login to comment

About the author

N S Ramnath
N S Ramnath

Senior Writer

Founding Fuel

NS Ramnath is a senior writer and part of the core team at Founding Fuel, and co-author of the book, The Aadhaar Effect. His main interests lie in technology, business, society, and how they interact and influence each other. He writes a regular column on disruptive technologies, and takes regular stock of key news and perspectives from across the world. 

Ram, as everybody calls him, experiments with newer story-telling formats, tailored for the smartphone and social media as well, the outcomes of which he shares with everybody on the team. It then becomes part of a knowledge repository at Founding Fuel and is continuously used to implement and experiment with content formats across all platforms. 

He is also involved with data analysis and visualisation at a startup, How India Lives.

Prior to Founding Fuel, Ramnath was with Forbes India and Economic Times as a business journalist. He has also written for The Hindu, Quartz and Scroll. He has degrees in economics and financial management from Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning.

He tweets at @rmnth and spends his spare time reading on philosophy.

Also by me

You might also like